Notice

I am working on the template of this blog today in order to chase down some problems that have developed with my template and widgets.

nullspace for future use

nullspace for future use

About

Friday, February 2, 2007

The Problem with Alternative Fuels

Almost all schemes for converting our nation to alternative sources of energy have one thing in common: lack of Real Estate.

A Long Row To Hoe

Proposals for an alcohol-fueled end to dependence on foreign oil do not sit lightly on the American landscape. Can they fit within our borders at all?

State Of The Union speeches tend to cross using figures with speaking figuratively, and this hybrid rhetoric can bear strange fruit, like the switchgrass mania spreading up K Street like kudzu. Math has never been the Beltway's strongest suit, and it will take a while for many in DC to realize that biofuel, like the solar and wind energy franchises already on offer, suffers from sheer lack of real estate.Huffnpuffes A recent WSJ Op-ed devoted a thousand words to singing the praises of cellulose fermentation , but neglected to divide its rosy bottom line projections by ethanol's depressingly low energy content - a barrel of the stuff falls so far short of real gasoline-- over two million BTU's,that you'd need about ten gallons extra to equal a tankful. Japan's last gasp in World War II was distilling biomass to get kamekaze fuel.

Solar ranching translates into paving areas the size of Massachusetts with silicon panels. But farming out the fuel supply means putting multiples of Texas under the plough. Even corn as tall as an elephant's eye yields less than half a gallon of ethanol per acre per day. And biotech might, at best, wring another quart out of fertile farmland.

That's just not enough...


Continue Reading

7 comments :

Hey TP!

Thanks for adding us to your blogroll. It is appreciated and reciprocated.

All the best,
Jake

The good news is we don't have to solve this problem all at once. We start by increasing energy efficiency everywhere, adding offshore wind farms, solar shingles and windows, and biodiesel infrastructure.

These measures alone would make an enormous difference in pollution rates.

Also, there is new scrubbing tech to retrofit our power plants with - a chilled ammonia that is being installed into a plant this summer for further testing.

There's just so much we can do now. Incremental change can happen now. Right now.

And if you're reading the climate reports, then don't you think now would be a great time to start?

Or will you tell your grandchildren that you didn't support a cleaner environment?

As long as those increases in efficiency are not at government force, which would put an artificial pressure on the market, remember the horror that was Nixon's Price Controls? And the inflated prices in the Health Care field now that is a result of government interference.

Global Warming being caused by man has all the hallmarks of a religion. The thing is, all the prophets have been proven wrong, and have been responsible for millions of deaths. Rachel Carson's screed against DDT has been proven wrong, and cost the lives of 50 million in the third world. Even the UN has allowed DDT to be re-introduced. A lot of the Illegal Aliens from Mexico bring DDT with them, and smuggle it into the US to use in their jobs, and to keep the areas around their homes free from mosquitoes. You can eat DDT without any ill effects.

We are still coming out of the mini ice age of the 10th-13th centuries, and Global Warming is caused by the Solar Cycle. Mars is seeing it's polar caps melt (caused by our landers and rovers no doubt), and Saturn and Titan are also warming (no doubt caused by probes and landers as well).

When the Solar Cycle starts resulting in lower temps, and we hurdle toward a new ice age...will the left preach more emissions to save Manhattan from mile-high glaciers? Oh, Dr. Carl Sagan already said that, didn't he? Hmmm... Hmmm... (I'm working on my Algore imitation).

As for my grandchildren, our environment is cleaner by orders of magnitude than during the Industrial Revolution, and realize that one volcanic eruption (especially the undersea eruptions) can release more pollutants than during the entire history of mankind.

Conservative my ass.

What's conservative is not betting the farm against the opinion of the vast majority of world climate scientists.

It's crazy not to try to improve things. C-R-A-Z-Y.

The asthma rates in our mountains are ample evidence that we need to reverse our carbon output.

At least you admit that it is the opinion. Consensus has no place in science.

In fact, I'm looking for ways to increase my carbon dioxide output. Over the last six months, I've been trying to burn a gallon of gas just for the heck of it...I need to video that, and upload it to youtube just for kicks.

Mankind is not the cause of global warming. You guys are like the flea floating on his back down the river with a woody calling for the drawbridge to be lifted!!!jer

Gravity is a theory, too, TP. I'm sure you'll be denying gravity though until something beyond consensus is reached.