Senator Obama must be getting pretty desperate if this is all he has to bring against Senator McCain. A case that ended with the exoneration of McCain nearly two decades ago in 1991.
From the New York Times [Nov 21, 1999]:
His time under ethics scrutiny ''only further encouraged him to follow his own compass,'' said Scott Celley, his former press secretary. ''His attitude was that 'I've got to decide what's right for myself and go at it without relenting, no matter who is standing in the way.' '' Mr. Celley says Senator McCain has carried that attitude with him in other fights, from overhauling campaign finance to federal anti-tobacco legislation to this year's budget battle, in which the Arizona Republican has denounced pork-barrel spending.
The cloud of scandal did not lift until Nov. 20, 1991, when he was exonerated by the Senate Ethics Committee after an investigation that included weeks of televised hearings. The committee found that Mr. McCain had ''exercised poor judgment'' in attending, with four other senators, two meetings with federal banking regulators, but it found no improper action on his part.
''I found nothing in my investigation which caused me to question Senator McCain's integrity,'' said Robert Bennett, the Washington lawyer who was special counsel to the ethics panel during what is called the Keating Five investigation. Mr. Bennett, more recently, has been one of President Clinton's lawyers.
Senator McCain had taken $112,000 in Keating-related campaign donations, trips aboard Mr. Keating's corporate jet and family vacations at the executive's Bahamas hideaway. While legal, these gifts made his attendance at the meetings with federal regulators all the more questionable. (The other four senators had also taken large contributions from Mr. Keating, some of them far more than Mr. McCain.)
He survived and was re-elected easily in 1992 and again, with almost 70 percent of his state's vote, in 1998. Three other members of the Keating Five were more seriously rebuked by the ethics panel and all of them retired rather than face difficult re-election battles. John Glenn of Ohio, who was exonerated with Mr. McCain, was also re-elected in 1992, but retired in 1998.
This means nothing to Obama and the people in his campaign. In their release of the Keating Five Video, they will bank on the fact that the Legacy Media will refuse to report the truth of the matter and just report on the Obama Campaign activity, allowing people to assume that it is true, when in point of fact, it is a lie.
One of North Carolina's premiere bloggers, Sister Toldjah, has an excellent post with links to plenty of other sources on the dastardly move by the Obama Campaign.
**3.22 pm** Even the local lefties have been suckered into the lie...and Ed Morrissey is addressing that very eloquently on today's show.
Maybe they can tell me the difference between Frank Keating and William Ayers...
Keating didn't kill anyone and McCain renounced him.
Ayers and associates did kill people and Obama has not renounced him.
3 comments :
You're not serious.
You may not have noticed, but after the economic meltdown McCain's poll numbers have gone straight to hell. It was after this happened that the campaign, with the aid of a few crazy-ass footsoldiers, decided to make this smear a talking point and the central argument against Barack Obama.
Not issues. Associations.
Guilt by specious association is some lowly stuff. McCain's character immediately ought to be called into question for pushing this line of nonsense.
His Keating Five stuff was put out there by the Obama campaign only after McCain camp dove into the sewer head first. Truth.
If you're looking for a murderous association, you need look no further than the relationship between John McCain and George W. Bush. Bush started a war of choice that's killed over four thousand Americans and upwards of a hundred thousand Iraqi civilians. He's left our economy in a tailspin. He's made a mockery of our Constitution.
But to folks like you, TP, a school reform legend in Chicago is the real danger.
Cuckoobananas.
*
Recently an insurance company nearly wind up....
A bank is nearly bankrupt......filing chapter 11 protection.
How it affect you? Did you buy insurance? Did you buy mini note or bonds?
Who fault?
They bailout trouble finance company, but they will not bail out your credit card bills……And the bill out of company is still not enough yet…….You got no choice, and no point pointing finger but you can prevent similar things from happen again……
The top management of the Public listed company ( belong to "public" ) salary should be tied a portion of it to the shares price ( IPO or ave 5 years ).... so when the shares price drop, it don't just penalise the investors, but those who don't take care of the company.....If this rule is pass on, without any need of further regulation, all industries ( as long as it is public listed ) will be self regulated......because the top management will be concern about their own pay check……
Meanwhile if company was being acquired, there will be a great movement in terms of staff……eventually staff suffer also.
Some might feel that it sound stupid….. as there is long and Short position…but in reality there is still many different caliber CEO…..so there is still long and short…..They can ban short selling definitely they can do something about this.......
Are you a partisan?
Sign a petition to your favourite president candidate, congress member, House of representative again and ask for their views to not just comment on this, and what regulations they are going to commit and implementation the regulation, I believe should vote for the one who come suggest good implementation and let’s see who back up, which don’t implement after just mentioning in the election campaign.....If you agree on my point, please share with many people as possible.... Finance and Media are the two only industries can shaken politics ( Maybe Hackers can ), please help to highlight also...
Blog
http://remindmyselfinstock.blogspot.com/
Facebook, come and join as a friend and share with your friends…..
Remind.myself@yahoo.com
HERE HERE Gordon ... you said everything I was going to say in a much more eloquent fashion than I would have mustered.
POOR JUDGEMENT IS the key phrase in all of this.
not what we want in a president.
his conflict of interest should have been a red flag for him to never have attended any meetings on his behalf, and he went anyway.
POOR JUDGEMENT!
Post a Comment