Notice

I am working on the template of this blog today in order to chase down some problems that have developed with my template and widgets.

Saturday, February 14, 2009

Liberaltarianism and Intellectual Dishonesty

Donald, over at American Power, addresses an issue I have blogged about previously here, only his name for the fusion of Progressives and Libertarians (Liberaltarianism) is better than my term, Proggressitarianism. 


My previous commentary is available in the following articles:


Don Yelton Speaks at The Action Club (The speaker makes reference to an aspect of the problem, and I provide audio from Matt Mittan's "Take A Stand" to illustrate the point).


Asheville Progressives React To The Carolina Stompers (included because it was an alliance of progressives, wiccans, libertarians and other pagans who opposed the Carolina Stompers so vociferously. I will be making more videos mocking the political actors in Asheville soon).

What Donald does is note the indictment of..." the alliance In "The Luxury of 'Liberaltarianism'," Robert mercilessly pulls the mask off the alliance between leftists and libertarians, which I've long thought has been one of the most intellectually bankrupt and ideologically decrepit marriages in recent political history"

Here is a snippet of his take and further thoughts on the matter (and you can read the whole thing at American Power):

An animating force for the paradigm seems to be the resistance to tradition and universal morality. This can be seen in the excursions on atheism at the blog, where we see commentary suggesting that since there's no possibility for the falsification of God's existence, those of religious faith are essentially "lunatics" for proposing an alternative theory of evolution in Intelligent Design. Or we can see this in the virtually unhinged attacks on neoconservatives and the war in Iraq, where E.D. Kain excoriates the Bush administration for "invading countries such as Iraq and Afghanistan in order to democratize them ..." Never mind that the origins of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq emerged out of vastly different contexts - with varying methodologies of strategic justification - the overall animus toward the forward use of state power places this "libertarian-progressive" agenda firmly in the nihilist camp of the "world peace" Utopians Robert Stacy McCain mentions above.

But what's especially bothersome about these folks is the confused intellectualism on questions of moral right. It's almost stomach-churning to read 
E.D. Kain's comments on Israel following this week's election: "Israel, once lively with the dream of the original idealists who founded it, has over the years become increasingly militarized, entrenched, and anti-Democratic." This is not much different from the commentary on Israel one finds at the neo-Stalinist Firedoglake. E.D. Kain, of course, has problems with intellectual integrity, as I've already noted, and he joins Mark Thompson in a left-libertarian hall of shame on that score.

It should be no surprise that these folks find inspiration in the ravings of 
Andrew Sullivan, whose recent libertarian strain led him to suggest that, "Yes, Michael Phelps took a few hits from a bong at a party ... does anyone think that smoking pot would give him an unfair advantage in the pool? Please. When on earth are we going to grow up as a culture?" I guess "growing up" as a culture would mean that the majority of Americans would have to kowtow to the radical libertarian demands for same-sex marriage, which is a big agenda for the "young turks" of the right for whom "the real respectability of a solid argument is preferable to the worthless respectability one gets" by advocating for "more humane" positions on some of the most hot-button social issues of the day.

0 comments :