Notice

I am working on the template of this blog today in order to chase down some problems that have developed with my template and widgets.

Macon County Commissioners

Coverage of the meetings of the Macon County Board of County Commissioners.

Franklin Town Board of Aldermen

Coverage of the meetings of the Franklin Town Board of Aldermen.

Macon County School Board

Coverage of the meetings of the Macon County School Board.

Photoblog

Photos from my photoblog.

nullspace for future use

nullspace for future use

About

Showing posts with label RKBA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label RKBA. Show all posts

Thursday, January 24, 2013

Democrats Take Aim At Weapons Ban


I'm starting off my coverage of this event with a commentary.


COMMENTARY

The Democrats are taking aim at another weapons ban, this time under the auspices of US Senator Dianne Feinstein's Assault Weapons Ban of 2013. This is a bill that proposes to ban weapons and to force the registration of previously purchased weapons that meet the criteria for being banned and illegally forces these legal owners to undergo a background check. This, in my opinion, violates the ex post facto provisions in the US Constitution. [link] But, I don't expect Democrats to be people who would respect any provision of our constitution if it stands in the way of something they want.

The introduction of this bill should be the clarion call to awaken a movement so large that it will dwarf the Tea Party of 2009. What I think this new movement should do is to work tirelessly to oppose these members of Congress and to contribute to their defeat when they next come up for election. We should work to ensure that it would be political suicide for anyone to introduce a similar bill for the next generation.

Video and details are below.


C-SPAN Video of the entire event is available at C-SPAN.



Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and a group of Senate Democrats on Thursday introduced legislation to ban the sale and manufacture of more than 150 types of semi-automatic weapons with military-style features.

The legislation also bans magazines holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition and requires people who already own assault rifles to use secure storage and safety devices and bars them from selling high-capacity clips.

“No weapon is taken from anyone,” said Feinstein. “The purpose is to dry up the supply of these weapons over time.”
Unlike the 1994 assault-weapons ban, there is no sunset provision in Feinstein’s newest gun-control bill.

Source: The Hill



Here is a bill summary and a list of the weapons that would be banned under the bill:

Assault Weapons Ban of 2013

Mass shootings in Newtown, Aurora, and Tucson have demonstrated all too clearly the need to regulate military-style assault weapons and high capacity ammunition magazines. These weapons allow a gunman to fire a large number of rounds quickly and without having to reload.

What the bill does:

The legislation bans the sale, transfer, manufacturing and importation of:
  • All semiautomatic rifles that can accept a detachable magazine and have at least one military feature: pistol grip; forward grip; folding, telescoping, or detachable stock; grenade launcher or rocket launcher; barrel shroud; or threaded barrel.
  • All semiautomatic pistols that can accept a detachable magazine and have at least one military feature: threaded barrel; second pistol grip; barrel shroud; capacity to accept a detachable magazine at some location outside of the pistol grip; or semiautomatic version of an automatic firearm.
  • All semiautomatic rifles and handguns that have a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds.
  • All semiautomatic shotguns that have a folding, telescoping, or detachable stock; pistol grip; fixed magazine with the capacity to accept more than 5 rounds; ability to accept a detachable magazine; forward grip; grenade launcher or rocket launcher; or shotgun with a revolving cylinder.
  • All ammunition feeding devices (magazines, strips, and drums) capable of accepting more than 10 rounds.
  • 157 specifically-named firearms (listed at the end of this page).
The legislation excludes the following weapons from the bill:
  • Any weapon that is lawfully possessed at the date of the bill’s enactment;
  • Any firearm manually operated by a bolt, pump, lever or slide action;
  • Assault weapons used by military, law enforcement, and retired law enforcement; and
  • Antique weapons.
The legislation protects hunting and sporting firearms:
  • The bill excludes 2,258 legitimate hunting and sporting rifles and shotguns by specific make and model.
The legislation strengthens the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban and state bans by:
  • Moving from a 2-characteristic test to a 1-characteristic test.
    • The bill also makes the ban harder to evade by eliminating the easy-to-remove bayonet mounts and flash suppressors from the characteristics test.
  • Banning dangerous aftermarket modifications and workarounds.
    • Bump or slide fire stocks, which are modified stocks that enable semi-automatic weapons to fire at rates similar to fully automatic machine guns.
    • So-called “bullet buttons” that allow the rapid replacement of ammunition magazines, frequently used as a workaround to prohibitions on detachable magazines.
    • Thumbhole stocks, a type of stock that was created as a workaround to avoid prohibitions on pistol grips.
  • Adding a ban on the importation of assault weapons and large-capacity magazines.
  • Eliminating the 10-year sunset that allowed the original federal ban to expire.
The legislation addresses the millions of assault weapons and large-capacity magazines currently in existence by:
  • Requiring a background check on all sales or transfers of a grandfathered assault weapon.
    • This background check can be run through the FBI or, if a state chooses, initiated with a state agency, as with the existing background check system.
  • Prohibiting the sale or transfer of large-capacity ammunition feeding devices lawfully possessed on the date of enactment of the bill.
  • Allowing states and localities to use federal Byrne JAG grant funds to conduct a voluntary buy-back program for grandfathered assault weapons and large-capacity ammunition feeding devices.
  • Imposing a safe storage requirement for grandfathered firearms, to keep them away from prohibited persons.
  • Requiring that assault weapons and large-capacity ammunition feeding devices manufactured after the date of the bill’s enactment be engraved with the serial number and date of manufacture of the weapon

Assault weapon bans have been proven to be effective

The 1994 Assault Weapons Ban was effective at reducing crime and getting these military-style weapons off our streets. Since the ban expired, more than 350 people have been killed and more than 450 injured by these weapons.
  • A Justice Department study of the assault weapons ban found that it was responsible for a 6.7% decrease in total gun murders, holding all other factors equal.
    • Source: Jeffrey A. Roth & Christopher S. Koper, “Impact Evaluation of the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act of 1994,” (March 1997).
  • The same study also found that “Assault weapons are disproportionately involved in murders with multiple victims, multiple wounds per victim, and police officers as victims.”
  • The use of assault weapons in crime declined by more than two-thirds by about nine years after 1994 Assault Weapons Ban took effect.
    • Source: Christopher S. Koper, “An Updated Assessment of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban: Impacts on Gun Markets and Gun Violence, 1994-2003” (June 2004), University of Pennsylvania, Report to the National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
  • The percentage of firearms seized by police in Virginia that had high-capacity magazines dropped significantly during the ban. That figure has doubled since the ban expired.
  • When Maryland imposed a more stringent ban on assault pistols and high-capacity magazines in 1994, it led to a 55% drop in assault pistols recovered by the Baltimore Police Department.
    • Source: Douglas S. Weil & Rebecca C. Knox, Letter to the Editor, The Maryland Ban on the Sale of Assault Pistols and High-Capacity Magazines: Estimating the Impact in Baltimore, 87 Am. J. of Public Health 2, Feb. 1997.
  • 37% of police departments reported seeing a noticeable increase in criminals’ use of assault weapons since the 1994 federal ban expired.
    • Source: Police Executive Research Forum, Guns and Crime: Breaking New Ground by Focusing on the Local Impact (May 2010).  

List of firearms prohibited by name

Rifles: All AK types, including the following: AK, AK47, AK47S, AK–74, AKM, AKS, ARM, MAK90, MISR, NHM90, NHM91, Rock River Arms LAR–47, SA85, SA93, Vector Arms AK–47, VEPR, WASR–10, and WUM, IZHMASH Saiga AK, MAADI AK47 and ARM, Norinco 56S, 56S2, 84S, and 86S, Poly Technologies AK47 and AKS;

All AR types, including the following: AR–10, AR–15, Armalite M15 22LR Carbine, Armalite M15–T, Barrett REC7, Beretta AR–70, Bushmaster ACR, Bushmaster Carbon 15, Bushmaster MOE series, Bushmaster XM15, Colt Match Target Rifles, DoubleStar AR rifles, DPMS Tactical Rifles, Heckler & Koch MR556, Olympic Arms, Remington R–15 rifles, Rock River Arms LAR–15, Sig Sauer SIG516 rifles, Smith & Wesson M&P15 Rifles, Stag Arms AR rifles, Sturm, Ruger & Co. SR556 rifles; Barrett M107A1; Barrett M82A1; Beretta CX4 Storm; Calico Liberty Series; CETME Sporter; Daewoo K–1, K–2, Max 1, Max 2, AR 100, and AR 110C; Fabrique Nationale/FN Herstal FAL, LAR, 22 FNC, 308 Match, L1A1 Sporter, PS90, SCAR, and FS2000; Feather Industries AT–9; Galil Model AR and Model ARM; Hi-Point Carbine; HK–91, HK–93, HK–94, HK–PSG–1 and HK USC; Kel-Tec Sub–2000, SU–16, and RFB; SIG AMT, SIG PE–57, Sig Sauer SG 550, and Sig Sauer SG 551; Springfield Armory SAR–48; Steyr AUG; Sturm, Ruger Mini-14 Tactical Rife M–14/20CF;

All Thompson rifles, including the following: Thompson M1SB, Thompson T1100D, Thompson T150D, Thompson T1B, Thompson T1B100D, Thompson T1B50D, Thompson T1BSB, Thompson T1–C, Thompson T1D, Thompson T1SB, Thompson T5, Thompson T5100D, Thompson TM1, Thompson TM1C; UMAREX UZI Rifle; UZI Mini Carbine, UZI Model A Carbine, and UZI Model B Carbine; Valmet M62S, M71S, and M78; Vector Arms UZI Type; Weaver Arms Nighthawk; Wilkinson Arms Linda Carbine.
Pistols: All AK–47 types, including the following: Centurion 39 AK pistol, Draco AK–47 pistol, HCR AK–47 pistol, IO Inc. Hellpup AK–47 pistol, Krinkov pistol, Mini Draco AK–47 pistol, Yugo Krebs Krink pistol;

All AR–15 types, including the following: American Spirit AR–15 pistol, Bushmaster Carbon 15 pistol, DoubleStar Corporation AR pistol, DPMS AR–15 pistol, Olympic Arms AR–15 pistol, Rock River Arms LAR 15 pistol; Calico Liberty pistols; DSA SA58 PKP FAL pistol; Encom MP–9 and MP–45; Heckler & Koch model SP-89 pistol; Intratec AB–10, TEC–22 Scorpion, TEC–9, and TEC–DC9; Kel-Tec PLR 16 pistol;

The following MAC types: MAC–10, MAC–11; Masterpiece Arms MPA A930 Mini Pistol, MPA460 Pistol, MPA Tactical Pistol, and MPA Mini Tactical Pistol; Military Armament Corp. Ingram M–11, Velocity Arms VMAC; Sig Sauer P556 pistol; Sites Spectre;

All Thompson types, including the following: Thompson TA510D, Thompson TA5;

All UZI types, including: Micro-UZI.
Shotguns: Franchi LAW–12 and SPAS 12;

All IZHMASH Saiga 12 types, including the following:IZHMASH Saiga 12, IZHMASH Saiga 12S, IZHMASH Saiga 12S EXP–01, IZHMASH Saiga 12K, IZHMASH Saiga 12K–030, IZHMASH Saiga 12K–040 Taktika; Streetsweeper; Striker 12.
Belt-fed semiautomatic firearms: 

All belt-fed semiautomatic firearms including TNW M2HB.
Source: US Senator Dianne Feinstein




Thursday, January 10, 2013

Macon County Commissioners 01-08-2013

The Macon County Commissioners met Tuesday night for the first regular meeting of the year. I have embedded videos of the meeting below. About 20 minutes into the first video is the portion of the meeting where Macon County Sheriff Robbie Holland ran a scenario involving a shooter at a school for the Commissioners to establish why he is against arming school teachers.


Prior to the meeting, the county recognized long serving employees with pins and plaques. I previously posted the video and photos of that at this link.



Part One

Part Two


MACON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
JANUARY 8, 2013
AGENDA

NOTE: Service awards for county employees
will be presented beginning at 5:30 p.m.
1. 6:00 p.m. - Call to order and welcome by Chairman Corbin

2. Announcements

3. Moment of Silence

4. Pledge of Allegiance

5. Public Hearing(s) - Installment Financing Contract for Improvements to Highlands School
NOTE: Consideration of the contract and other related matters will immediately follow the public hearing

6. Public Comment Period

7. Adjustments to and approval of the agenda

8. Reports Presentations
  • School Resource Officers - Sheriff Robert Holland
  • Update on Parker Meadows Recreation Project - Seth Adams and Mike Lovoy
9. Old Business
  • Macon County Public Health FY 12-13 Billing and Collection Policies and Fee Schedules - Jim Bruckner, Public Health Director
  • QZAB Reimbursement Resolution
10. New Business
  • Request from the Sky Valley/Scaly Mountain Volunteer Fire & Rescue Department for relief fund money - David Key
  • Resolution approving terms of loan modification - Finance Director
11. Consent Agenda - Attachment #11 
All items below are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. No separate discussion will be held except on request of a member of the Board of Commissioners.
  • Minutes of the December 11, 2012 meeting
  • Budget Amendments # 87-91
  • Tax releases
  • Monthly Ad Valorem Tax Collection Report (no action necessary)
12. Appointments 

13. Closed session (if necessary)


14. Adjournment/Recess


Upcoming Meeting Schedule
  • Essentials of County Government - January 9-10, Asheville, NC
  • Mid-Year Update Meeting - Saturday, January 19 at 9 a.m. at the SCC Macon Campus Conference Room
  • NCACC Legislative Goals Conference - January 24-25, Sheraton RTP in Durham County


And here are supporting documents for this meeting:



At 6 o'clock, the regular meeting will begin and a public hearing will be held regarding an Installment Financing Contract for Improvements to Highlands School.


Also, Commissioner Beale has asked Sheriff Robert Holland to address school safety issues as they relate to School Resource Officers (SROs). Other details of the meeting can be found on the abbreviated agenda above and the full forty page agenda below.


2012 Service Awards


01.08.13 BOC Agenda Packet for iPad Final



Thursday, January 3, 2013

FPS Russia Tries Out the DRD Paratus 18

FPS Russia Close Call


+Fps Russia delivers another amazing video, this one a 7.62 x 51 mm rifle that can break down to fit in a backpack or small suitcase and can be re-assembled very quickly with no special tools needed...except perhaps a little common sense when blowing up pick ups...



Thursday, December 20, 2012

Who Does the US Constitution Apply To?


I think most people entirely miss the point when they discuss what rights we have or don't have in our Republic, the United States of America.

The recent debate on gun rights is proceeding under the assumption that the federal government has the right to put restrictions on the citizens as to what type of firearm they can own and what they cannot, and whether or not it is to be registered, or if certain types can be banned.

The federal government does not have the right, or the authority, to infringe upon our right to own firearms. The National Firearms Act (whether 1934, 1968 or any future act) is unconstitutional. It is null and void. Anyone sitting on a jury that is trying a case where someone is charged under any of these acts should return a verdict of "not guilty" regardless of what instructions they receive from a judge.

Below is a more clear statement of these ideas in general...



The important point is that the Constitution doesn't apply to Americans, it doesn't apply to citizens, it doesn't even apply to "people." It applies to the federal government. The body of the Constitution tells the federal government what it is allowed to do, and in some places it explains how to do it (election procedures and such). The Bill of Rights tells the federal government what it is not allowed to do . . .
  1. Make no law abridging freedom of speech, press, religion, or assembly,
  2. Do not infringe on the right to keep and bear arms.
  3. Don't quarter soldiers in peacetime.
  4. Don't conduct unreasonable searches and seizures.
  5. Don't commit double jeopardy or force people to testify against themselves.
  6. Don't deny an accused a speedy trial.
  7. Don't deny an accused a trial by jury.
  8. Do not impose excessive bail.
  9. Just because certain rights of the people aren't mentioned in this Constitution doesn't mean you're allowed to usurp them.
  10. Don't exercise any power not authorized in this Constitution.
Where exceptions were meant to apply, they are specifically stated. And there are no exceptions stated for any type of guns, for any type of speech, for any specific crimes, or for crimes where non-citizens are involved.


~Harry Browne [1]

Hat Tip to Kernersville Lawyer on Facebook, who posted an excerpt of this earlier on his page. And that posting prompted me to look for more information. 

Friday, July 2, 2010

Chicago City Council Passes New Handgun Restrictions Only 4 Days After Previous Restrictions Struck Down By Supreme Court

Gun Control Advocates Hall of Fame



Barely four days after the Supreme Court affirmed the right of Chicagoans to keep and bear arms in defense of their families and property, the city council of Chicago has passed a new draconian set of Daley handgun restrictions. Perhaps I should add Mayor Daley and the 45 members of the Chicago City Council to the Gun Control Advocates Hall of Fame pictured above.


Mayor Daley had been prepared to have his unconstitutional restrictions overturned, according to this article in the Chicago Tribune.


Read more about it...


Four days after the U.S. Supreme Court gutted Chicago’s longtime handgun ban, the City Council on Friday enacted a whole new set of gun-control measures.


Alderman voted 45-0 in favor even as some of them acknowledged how little the restrictions would do to quell violent crime.


The rush job is aimed at having a new set of established handgun restrictions in place before a lower court enters a final order to formally strike down the city’s gun ban.


The ordinance “places reasonable regulations regarding who should and should not be able to possess a handgun in their home for self-defense,” Mayor Richard Daley said after the special council meeting. “With this law, we're supporting adults who legitimately want a gun in their home for self-defense. But at the same time, we're trying to keep guns out of the hands of gang bangers and drug dealers who only want to terrorize our communities.”


Several aldermen, however, said the ordinance is more likely to affect responsible, law-abiding gun owners than the thugs causing mayhem on hot weekend nights.


“You cannot legislate criminals, they are going to be criminals no matter what,” said Ald. Ed Smith, 28th. “And the people who intend to do crime, they are going to do it in whatever manner they can. They are going to get a gun wherever they can. And they are going to use it. And they are not going to register their gun.”


After making a similar acknowledgement, Ald. Deborah Graham, 29th, issued a plea. “I also would encourage gang bangers who get those guns unlawfully to stop getting them unlawfully,” she said. “We’re going to increase the penalties to make sure our communities are safe.”


When the new law takes effect in 10 days, people who want to keep a handgun in their homes and be on the right side of the law will have to obtain Chicago firearm permits. To get one, they must take firearms training and not have convictions for a violent crime, unlawful use of a firearm or two or more charges of driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol.


Each weapon would have to be registered, and those with permits will only be able to register one weapon each month.
Guns could only be kept in the home, and each per permit holder in the home could only have one handgun in readily operable condition at a time.
Source: Chicago Tribune


Will the last American who believes in the Second Amendment turn the lights out in Chicago when they leave?


Previously:




Supreme Court Affirms Second Amendment







Bookmark and Share

Monday, June 28, 2010

Supreme Court Affirms Second Amendment

The Supreme Court. Photo Credit: Scarlet Holland


The scary part is that it was a 5-4 decision. Our Republic, and Constitution, hang by a thread.


Here is an excerpt:




SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Syllabus
MCDONALD ET AL. v. CITY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS,
ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT


No. 08–1521. Argued March 2, 2010—Decided June 28, 2010


Two years ago, in District of Columbia v. Heller, this Court held that the Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms for the purpose of self-defense and struck down a Dis-trict of Columbia law that banned the possession of handguns in thehome. Chicago (hereinafter City) and the village of Oak Park, a Chi-cago suburb, have laws effectively banning handgun possession byalmost all private citizens. After Heller, petitioners filed this federalsuit against the City, which was consolidated with two related ac-tions, alleging that the City’s handgun ban has left them vulnerable to criminals. They sought a declaration that the ban and several re-lated City ordinances violate the Second and Fourteenth Amend-ments. Rejecting petitioners’ argument that the ordinances are un-constitutional, the court noted that the Seventh Circuit previouslyhad upheld the constitutionality of a handgun ban, that Heller had explicitly refrained from opining on whether the Second Amendment applied to the States, and that the court had a duty to follow estab-lished Circuit precedent. The Seventh Circuit affirmed, relying on three 19th-century cases—United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U. S. 542, Presser v. Illinois, 116 U. S. 252, and Miller v. Texas, 153 U. S. 535— which were decided in the wake of this Court’s interpretation of theFourteenth Amendment’s Privileges or Immunities Clause in the Slaughter-House Cases, 16 Wall. 36.


Held: The judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded.




Source: SCOTUS Wiki, McDonald v. City of Chicago


Here is the full decision:McDonald v. City Of Chicago






Bookmark and Share

Friday, April 16, 2010

The Virginia Tech Massacre




Three years ago today, a criminal (who shall not be named here) with a weapon roamed free in a gun free zone, able to pick off targets at will.


The shooter, a student, shot 49 people on the Virginia Tech campus that day. 32 people died, and 17 were wounded, but survived. A further 6 were wounded while escaping (jumping out of windows, off stairways, etc) from the kill zone.


There were many acts of heroism that day. Here are some of them:


Liviu Librescu, a 76 year old survivor of the Nazi death camps held his classroom door shut and purchased the time needed for his students to flee with his life.


Ryan C. Clark, a 22 year old senior, was shot and killed while trying to aid a fellow student.


Instructor Jocelyne Couture-Nowak and student Henry Lee were killed as they attempted to barricade the door to their classroom.


Students Katelyn Carney and Derek O'Dell were injured while holding the door closed to their classroom.


It is believed that student Partahi Mamora Halomoan Lumbantoruan may have protected fellow student Guillermo Colman by diving on top of him, and protecting him with his body. Partahi was killed after being shot multiple times.


Professor Kevin Granata brought 20 students from a nearby classroom into an office, where the door could be locked, on the third floor of Norris Hall. He was killed by the shooter while investigating the situation and looking for more students.


The shooter killed 5 faculty members and 27 students, and wounded 17 others three years ago today on the gun free campus of Virginia Tech before committing suicide.


One instructor, faculty member, grounds person or student with a firearm could have saved some of those lives. It is my belief that the people in charge of Virginia Tech were criminally, and personally, liable for every one of those deaths and injuries. Some of the victim's families have won some relief from the Commonwealth of Virginia.




I have always carried on college campuses I've attended, visited or driven through, and I am sure others do as well. One of these days, a shooter will have his killing spree cut short by an armed person who is exercising his/her constitutional rights, which exceed whatever local laws or ordinances have been enacted. I know that if I sat on a jury where charges were being brought against someone who defended them self (and others) with a weapon illegally carried...I would not vote to convict. I would hang the jury. For more informing on your rights while serving on a jury, please visit Fully Informed jury Association and the Juror Information Page. 
Download the handy information there and learn it well enough to be able to share it with your fellow jurors should the need ever arise.


The photo above and to the right is a reproduction of a sticker I always affix to signs placed at businesses and government buildings telling people that weapons aren't allowed on the premises, just to let people know that their Second Amendment Right has been suspended in the area, and that the owners of the business are now liable if you are killed or injured on their property.






Previously:


Virginia Tech Shootings


The Liberal Position on Virginia Tech


Blogging the Virginia Tech Shootings


WCU to Observe Moment of Silence


Aggregation of Virginia Tech Massacre Coverage


Brave Horatio


Whither Ismail Ax?

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Celebrating the Second Amendment:
Introducing the KRISS Vector CRB/SO™.45 ACP
A Post for Jessica B



















I'm dedicating this post to Jessica B (a sometime commenter here) and all those other Lefties who are afraid of people who are practicing their Second Amendment Rights by owning (and using) firearms.


A new submachine has been making the rounds over the past couple of years that uses a .45 ACP round (SQUEE!!!) and is named after an Indonesian sword called the Kris.


My favorite version of the KRISS is the one with the much shorter barrel, as pictured at the top of this post. It is a submachine gun that is available in a .45 ACP version. That's right, kids...why play with mere 9mm or .308 SMGs when a grown up .45 ACP is available? Especially one that doesn't kick like a mule.


The KRISS employs a revolutionary design in submachine gun design, the impact of the recoil is directed downward and counteracts the muzzle climb tendency of the weapon. From the KRISS-TDI website:


All traditional firearms share a common problem; they utilize heavy linear operating mechanisms that deliver recoil forces directly into the operator's shoulder. These forces cause the operator to constantly re-acquire his sight picture due to felt recoil shock and the resulting rotational muzzle climb. Newton's 3rd law; run amok.


In other words, if the point of operating a firearm is to put rounds in a specific location, why is it that traditional firearms, no matter how many tricky buffers, springs and pads are deployed, all work against the operator's goal?


The engineers at KRISS-TDI, starting with a clean computer screen and one goal in mind, have solved this century-old problem by creating the patented KRISS Super V System-the only firearm operating system in the world that actually works with the operator to help put more rounds on target, more of the time.


Here are a few videos that explore this submachine gun and the problems it solves for shooters...


First, an overview from the Discovery Channel:






And here is an overview brought to us by MilSpecMonkey:










Of course, nothing can top the stopping power of an automatic 12 gauge Street Sweeper:








It's great to be an American and to enjoy our God-given right to keep and bear arms!!!

Friday, October 16, 2009

Serial Killer Caught by Father

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

The Second Amendment


I think the the biggest problem lefties have with the idea that everyone has the right to have weapons...they know that if they go too far in their pursuit of socialism, we will take matters into our own hands.

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Dramatic Scene Unfolds at URTV as Police Remove Armed Man from Studio,
Citizens Speak Show Producer Don Yelton Suspended

The details are on The Carolina Stompers website.

My initial comment at this point is that I think the private investigator was very sloppy, and needs to work on the concealed part of concealed carry.

Don Yelton and Chad Nesbitt are friends of the recently ousted (by a vote of 8-0) URTV board member Richard Bernier. For more information on that long developing drama, see the Mountain Xpress, taking care to read the comments for a flavor of the situation.

Sunday, April 6, 2008

The Patriarch of the 2nd Amendment Has Passed


Charlton Heston (1923-2008)




The Heston family issued the following statement:

"To his loving friends, colleagues and fans, we appreciate your heartfelt prayers and support. Charlton Heston was seen by the world as larger than life. He was known for his chiseled jaw, broad shoulders and resonating voice, and, of course, for the roles he played. Indeed, he committed himself to every role with passion, and pursued every cause with unmatched enthusiasm and integrity.

We knew him as an adoring husband, a kind and devoted father, and a gentle grandfather, with an infectious sense of humor. He served these far greater roles with tremendous faith, courage and dignity. He loved deeply, and he was deeply loved.

No one could ask for a fuller life than his. No man could have given more to his family, to his profession, and to his country. In his own words, "I have lived such a wonderful life! I've lived enough for two people."

A private memorial service will be held. The family has requested that, in lieu of flowers, donations be made to the Motion Picture and Television Fund:

MPTF
22212 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 300
Woodland Hills, CA 91364
www.mptvfund.org




And the Full Version (3 video playlist):

Wednesday, April 2, 2008

Illegal Sign


I think these signs are so stupid, and violate (if obeyed) my 2nd Amendment Right to Keep and Bear Arms.
How do they know if you are carrying if they do not search everyone who enters?