Notice

I am working on the template of this blog today in order to chase down some problems that have developed with my template and widgets.

Macon County Commissioners

Coverage of the meetings of the Macon County Board of County Commissioners.

Franklin Town Board of Aldermen

Coverage of the meetings of the Franklin Town Board of Aldermen.

Macon County School Board

Coverage of the meetings of the Macon County School Board.

Photoblog

Photos from my photoblog.

nullspace for future use

nullspace for future use

About

Showing posts with label Courts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Courts. Show all posts

Friday, October 23, 2020

Jury Trails Resume in the 43rd Prosecutorial District

Press Release
43rd Prosecutorial District
Friday, October 23, 2020


After months of delay, jury trials resume on a limited basis next week in the 43rd Prosecutorial District, made up of the state’s seven westernmost counties and overseen by District Attorney Ashley Hornsby Welch.

The first jury trials in the district start Monday in Haywood County.

In March, Chief Justice Cheri Beasley ordered a statewide halt to jury trials to help combat coronavirus spread. She extended the restriction through Oct. 15. Though jury trials have not taken place, North Carolina’s judicial system has continued its day-to-day functions, such as accepting pleas, holding traffic court and granting protections to victims of domestic violence.

In anticipation of the gradual resumption of jury trials, Chief Justice Beasley directed senior resident superior court judges, in consultation with local officials, to craft court safety plans. The state’s Administrative Office of the Courts and the public health director for each county reviewed and approved all safety measures. The 43rd Prosecutorial District has two senior resident judges: Bradley B. Letts oversees 30B, made up of Haywood and Jackson counties; Bill Coward oversees 30A, made up of Macon, Clay, Cherokee, Graham and Swain counties.

The judges retain discretion to suspend jury trials in their counties in connection with COVID-19, based on local needs and conditions.

In this prosecutorial district, precautions in court include:

• Requiring face masks or shields.
• Separating summoned jurors 6- to 10-feet apart.
• Maintaining proper social distancing during breaks and deliberations.
• Limiting seating for spectators to designated spaces and holding one seat open for the press.
• Presenting exhibits to the jury electronically or in a collective fashion; no paper distribution is allowed.
• Providing COVID-19 medical screenings of jurors, court personnel, attorneys witnesses and other involved parties.
• Restricting county court sessions to one week only.
• Finding substitute sites for court if a particular county’s courtroom is too small to maintain social distancing.

Haywood County has adequately sized courtrooms, as well as a jury assembly room that provides still more space, Assistant District Attorney Jeff Jones said. Jurors will be seated in both the juror box and in the audience area of the courtroom, providing 6- to 10-foot distancing; additionally, the courtrooms have been refigured with safety in mind.
The one-week restriction for jury trials has shaped the types of cases that can be heard.
“Those selected for trial are factually brief and do not require a large number of witnesses,” Jones said.

After Haywood’s session, Jackson and Clay counties are scheduled to hold jury trials for one week each, beginning Monday, Nov. 2. Assistant District Attorney John Hindsman Jr. said Clay County has adequate space for court proceedings, but jury selection will move from the courthouse to the recreation center/gym.

Haywood County has a second session for jury trials beginning the week of Nov. 9. Cherokee County will hold jury trials the week of Nov. 16, in the usual venue. Macon, Swain and Graham counties start jury trials in the new year.




CROWDFUNDING OR DAY SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES


If you receive value from what Macon Media provides to the community, please consider becoming a supporter and contribute at least a dollar a month. Those who support Macon Media with at least a dollar a month receive early access to video of some events and meetings before they are made public on the website. Videos and news involving public safety are not subject to early access.



Become a Patron!



Or, if you prefer Pay Pal, try PayPal.me/MaconMedia



Published at 7:00pm Saturday, October 23, 2020

Wednesday, July 8, 2020

Michael Macht Sworn in as Assistant District Attorney



PRESS RELEASE
District Attorney Ashley Hornsby Welch
43rd Prosecutorial District
Wednesday, July 8


District Attorney Ashley Hornsby Welch announced Wednesday that Michael Macht has joined the 43rd Prosecutorial District as an assistant district attorney.
Based in Haywood County, Macht will work districtwide – across the seven westernmost counties – as needed. 


“Mike comes with an enormous amount of experience in criminal law,” Welch said. “I’m excited to add him to the team.”


District Court Judge Monica Leslie swore in Macht last week.


The district has an office in each of the seven counties and, with the addition of Macht, 42 employees, including 13 prosecutors.


Macht attended Catawba College in Salisbury. After graduating with a degree in political science and a minor in pre-law, he attended Penn State University in State College, Pennsylvania. He earned his Juris Doctor degree in 2005. 


After law school, Macht moved to Asheville, where he worked as a Buncombe County public defender. In 2008, he started his own law practice, specializing in criminal defense, juvenile defense, guardianship and personal injury work. E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina public records laws and if so, may be disclosed.


Published at 8:30am on Wednesday, July 8, 2020


Friday, June 26, 2020

District Attornet Ashley Welch Investigates Larger Spaces for Substitute Courtrooms During COVID-19 Pandemic


Photo Provided in Press Release


PRESS RELEASE
District Attorney Ashley Hornsby Welch
43rd Prosecutorial District
Friday, June 26


District Attorney Ashley Hornsby Welch said across the 43rd Prosecutorial District, in the state’s seven most-westernmost counties, court officials are identifying, examining and measuring large spaces for possible transformation into substitute courtrooms.

N.C. Chief Supreme Court Justice Cheri Beasley on May 21 ordered courts postpone all jury trials until August, because of COVID-19.

Many of the courtrooms in the far-west counties are too small to accommodate trials and maintain safe spacing – at least 6-feet apart – for those involved.

This week in Macon County, a group that included Senior Resident Superior Court Judge Bill Coward, District Attorney Ashley Welch and Macon County Clerk of Superior Court Vic Perry toured the Smoky Mountain Center for the Performing Arts in Franklin.

They decided on a possible jury room, discussed courtroom security and debated how best to space people in the audience area. The murder trial of Paul Snow, 53, accused of killing his mother and sister, is set for the Oct. 26th term of Macon County Superior Court. At least 100 potential jurors will be called to form the jury pool.

Selection of sites for jury trials is occurring in Haywood, Jackson, Swain, Cherokee, Clay and Graham counties, too, Welch said.






Tuesday, March 31, 2020

Press Release: 43rd Prosecutorial District
District Attorney Says Wheels of Justice Continue to Turn



PRESS RELEASE
43D PROSECUTORIAL DISTRICT
DA ASHLEY WELCH



District Attorney Ashley Hornsby Welch said Tuesday the judicial system remains open for business with measures in place to counter the coronavirus pandemic.
“The health and well-being of employees and community members we serve is a top priority,” said Welch, who oversees the 43rd Prosecutorial District, made up of the state’s seven westernmost counties. 

“Our office is working with others in the court system, including judges, clerks of court, defense attorneys and local law enforcement, to strike a balance between the needs of public health and public safety, while providing constitutional due-process rights as guaranteed under the constitution.”
Law enforcement officers continue to arrest offenders, including domestic-violence suspects, people who drive while impaired and others who commit criminal misdeeds. The District Attorney’s Office continues to process these cases.

Welch emphasized anyone who violates Gov. Roy Cooper’s stay-at-home order or who ignores locally enacted ordinances could face criminal charges.

“If law enforcement takes action, my office will prosecute to the fullest extent of the law,” she said. “People need to understand these regulations are in place for the good of all, to try to prevent the spread of COVID-19.”

Earlier this month, N.C. Supreme Court Chief Justice Cheri Beasley issued a set of emergency directives. Her orders to the judicial system included postponing most cases in Superior and District courts. She also instructed local officials to limit the risk of coronavirus exposure in courthouses.
Welch said members of the District Attorney’s Office are deemed essential employees. To limit the potential for coronavirus exposure, administrative staff members are working different shifts districtwide. This both provides protection and allows all seven county offices to stay open, with a staff member in each office available during business hours. 

Otherwise, to the extent possible, she and her 31-member staff are working remotely from their homes.

District Attorney Welch also said:

• Though still operational, the District Attorney’s Office is closed to members of the public. 

• Don’t worry about speeding tickets or other citations if you have a court date. These infractions are being continued to future dates. If you have an attorney, contact them. If you want to know the continued date, then call the Clerk of Court’s office in your county.

• Victims of crimes who have questions about open cases can call the District Attorney’s office in their respective county and leave a message. These messages will be returned as promptly as possible.

• www.nccourts.gov/services is available for handling some court business, including citation services, paying your ticket, court payments, signing up for court-date notifications and reminders and eFiling court documents for certain courts and case types. 


Tuesday, July 24, 2018

Press Release
Partnership Formed for Court Compass Project Workshop




PRESS RELEASE

North Carolina Judicial Branch
Raleigh, NC
July 23, 2018


The Court Compass project is exploring streamlined and simplified solutions that help people through the divorce and separation process.

The North Carolina Judicial Branch and the North Carolina Equal Access to Justice Commission (EATJC) are partnering with the Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System  (IAALS) to bring a design sprint workshop to Raleigh on August 11, 2018. 
"IAALS is excited to include North Carolina courts and families in our work toward simplifying the divorce and separation process," stated IAALS representative Michael Houlberg. 
The IAALS Court Compass project is exploring streamlined and simplified solutions that help people through the divorce and separation process. While the project aims to make the process better for all litigants, there is a particular focus on people who go to court without an attorney. 
A substantial body of research and litigant stories confirm that getting through the legal system without legal help is challenging. In many courts, a majority of divorce and separation cases involve at least one self-represented litigant. Recognizing that a considerable percentage of people seeking a divorce are without an attorney, the Court Compass project is directly incorporating their feedback and insights as part of the process to design solutions that make navigating the courts simpler and easier.   
In partnership with experts from Stanford Law School’s Legal Design Lab, Northeastern School of Law’s NuLawLab, and the University of Maine School of Law, the Court Compass project is employing a number of human-centered design tools, including in-person design sprints and other focus groups to test new processes and solutions in real time and refine them based on user feedback. 
“This design sprint offers North Carolina the opportunity to build on existing self represented litigant resources such as the new Judicial Branch website,” said Jennifer Lechner, Executive Director of the North Carolina Equal Access to Justice Commission. “We will continue to make meaningful access to justice our priority.”  
Through this partnership with IAALS, the North Carolina Judicial Branch hopes to identify barriers to court services that self-represented litigants face and to identify methods to overcome these barriers. 

CROWDFUNDING OR DAY SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES


If you receive value from what Macon Media provides to the community, please consider becoming a supporter and contribute at least a dollar a month.



Become a Patron!

If you have a business or event you are interested in sponsorship opportunities or underwriting coverage, send an email to editor@MaconMedia.com for more information. Serious inquiries only. Macon Media rewards early sponsors/underwriters with lifetime guaranteed low rates while newer sponsors/underwriters pay higher rates based on the date they first support Macon Media.

Thank You to the people who have been sending in donations and those businesses who are underwriting coverage of news and events. You have kept Macon Media online.



Published at 7:00 am on July 24, 2018

#WNCnews #MaconCrime #MaconSafety


Wednesday, July 20, 2016

Jury Finds Burr Not Guilty



At 5:23 pm, a jury serving the Macon County Superior Court found Jerimy Adam Burr not guilty on all counts he was charged with from a case stemming from an arrest on August 20, 2014.

After the defendant was found not guilty, he hugged his attorney and shook hands with and hugged his arresting officer and shook hands with the prosecutor.

He was charged with Traffick in Methamphetamine, Possession with intent to Deliver and Possession of Drug Paraphernalia. He was represented by Attorney Frank Lay of the Jackson County Bar.


The Honorable Robert G Horne presided over the court.

This is the main reason Macon Media does not publish mug shots. 


If Macon Media did publish mugshots, we would have to go back and add an addendum to every article featuring the mugshot to indicate the person was found not guilty by a jury of his or her peers, but the damage to that person's reputation could not be repaired.


MEDIA ROLL CALL

Macon Media was the only outlet present for the entire trial. 

A reporter with The Franklin Press was there for jury deliberations, but had to leave moments before the jury indicated they had reached a verdict.



CROWD FUNDING OR DAY SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES

If you receive value from what Macon Media provides to the community, please consider becoming a supporter and contribute at least a dollar a month.

If you have a business or event you are interested in sponsorship opportunities or underwriting coverage, send an email to editor@MaconMedia.com for more information. Serious inquiries only.

Thank You to the people who have been sending in donations and those businesses who are underwriting coverage of news and events. You have kept Macon Media online.

You can find out more information on how to do that and some of what I plan to accomplish if I reach certain levels of funding at >> https://www.patreon.com/MaconMedia




Sunday, August 23, 2015

Superior Court Cases
Afternoon Session August 17, 2015




Superior Court for Macon County was called into session for the afternoon of August 17, 2015 with the Honorable William H. Coward presiding.

Macon Media and The Franklin Press were the only local media organizations with reporters physically present in this session of court.

This article contains a list of dispositions and decisions in chronological order, augmented with with information from notes taken while the court was in session. Any errors are mine and all defendants are presumed innocent until their cases have been adjudicated. Where possible, hyperlinks have been added that may help promote understanding of the legal process in North Carolina. I have also not reported material that identifies the victims or family members of sexual abuse victims.

Please remember that I am an amateur in reporting on the court system. If you see errors in my reporting, let me know at editor@maconmedia.com or send me a private (or public message on my Macon Media facebook account at http://fb.com/maconcomedia

Here are links to some documents to help you understand how the court system works and some of the legal jargon in the coverage:






SUPERIOR COURT CASES 

Mann, Logan 14CRS51174 Assault by strangulation, assault on a female, assault in the presence of a minor
Represented by Bryson, Crystal

A plea of Not Guilty was entered and a trial date set for December 14, 2015.

Royse, Christopher
Represented by Beyer, Nikki

Case was continued to November 16, 2015 for another administrative setting.

Holt, Raymond 14CRS050188 Sex Offender/Child Premises
Represented by

Called and failed to appear. Order for Arrest was issued and bond raised to $30,000 cash secured. (The defendant appeared later in the session and the order was struck)

Timpton, Jeremy Probation Violation (In arrears over financial obligations)
Represented by

The defendant was given an extra 12 months of probation. (I could not find this case on the calendar, perhaps I did not understand the name of the defendant)

Roberts, David 14CRS050498, 14CRS050499, 14CRS 050500 Third degree sexual exploitation of a minor
Represented by Devereux, Sean

Case continued to 11-16-2015.

Holt, Raymond 14CRS050188 Sex Offender/Child Premises

Case was continued to 11-16-2015 at which time the State instructed the defendant to plea guilty or go to trial. The judge ordered the arrest order rescinded.

Moses, Chad Probation violation (could not find this case on the calendar)

Found in violation. Sentenced to 90 day CRV then terminate probation.

Jorge, Susan (could not find this case on the calendar)
Represented by (not represented)

The judge appointed Nikki Beyers and set next appearance at 11-16-2015.

Ward, Roberta Probation Violation (could not find this case on the calendar)
Represented by (waived right to an attorney)

Judge extended probation 12 months.

Hathcock, Preston 14CRS050590 Breaking and/or Entering
Represented by Beyers, Nikki

Continued to 11-16-2015.

The reporter for The Franklin Press arrived in the courtroom.

McKinney, Gavin 15CRS050552, 15CRS050553 Forgery and Obtain Property by False Pretenses and Uttering Forged Instrument
Represented by Neumann, Scott

Sentenced to 2 consecutive sentences 6 to 14 months with 26 days jail credit, active sentence suspended for a term of 24 months on probation, pay $200 fine, restitution to victim for checks, have no contact with the victim and $240 for attorney fees.

McConnell, Jeffrey 15CRS05065, 15CRS050652 Possess firearm by a felon, possession stolen firearm
Represented by Norwood, Gina

Continued to 11-16-2015.

Frazier, Steel 15CRS050759, 14CRS 050760, 14CRS050761 2nd Degree Burglary, Stolen good, larceny after B&E, larceny of Motor Vehicle, Possession of Stolen Motor vehicle
Represented by Norwood, Gina

Continued to 11-16-2015.


Burr, Jerimy 14CRS050881 Traffick in Methamphetamine and other related charges
Represented by Lay, Frank

Continued to 11-16-2015.

*note* There were several cases at this time I missed because I did not hear a name or complete case number called out as they were handling them rapid-fire.

Jones, Christopher (The case number was not on my calendar) Conspiracy to commit felony, possession of methamphetamine, etc.
Represented by Lepre, Stephanie

The defendant was sentenced and ordered to pay $7,409 in restitution.

10 to 21 months suspended for 36 months probation. Defendant sentenced to serve 90 days minus 17 days jail credit. Ordered to pay $900 in attorney fees, $7,409 in restitution, serve 48 hours community service, enter treatment for substance abuse and have no contact with co-defendant or victim during term of probation.
(This was a complicated sentence, so I have likely got part of it wrong).
This case resulted from the theft of the the days receipts of Cowee Convenience Store on August 4, 2014.



Hensley, Adam 14CRS50281 2nd Degree Murder
Represented by Belser, David

The defendant entered a plea of guilty according to a plea arrangement with the State and was sentenced to 48-67 months with 16 days jail credit with recommended work release.

This case resulted from the March 9, 2014 death of Larry Wilt during a fight at 21 Kirkland Road. More on the incident can be seen at http://is.gd/MM201406309 **note** The audio will not play because DivShare, where the audio is being housed, is undergoing restructuring. I have no idea when, or if, the audio will become available again.

Notes from the courtroom

The judge noted that the class D Felony the defendant is charged with exposes him to a possible 204 month maximum sentence.

The judge noted the plea arrangement and sentencing guidelines put the defendant in the mitigated range for a 48-70 month sentence (the judge later corrected the 70 to 67).

assistant District Attorney Eric Bellas, prosecuting for the State, reported the facts of the case for the record. They include:

On March 9, 2014 the Macon County Sheriff Office was called out to to a fight in progress at 21 Kirkland Road. The defendant was found with blood on his face and clothing. Larry Wilt was pronounced dead upon arrival at the hospital.

On March 10, 2014 an autopsy performed on the deceased found that the cause of death was several stab wounds.

Witnesses at the scene said the two were lifelong friends and had a disagreement while drinking and a fight started and escalated and moved outside. The State noted that the victim was stabbed with a weapon of opportunity after his nose was avulsed (bitten off).

He further reported that the defendant said he was defending himself and that witness testimony to investigators gave varying accounts of the incident, both implicating and exonerating the account of the defendant.

The mother of the victim made a statement to the court. She said the two 9Henskey and Wilt) had been friends for a long time. Most of her information on what happened came from Facebook and friends. She said that her son's children had no father and that her 6 year old grand daughter wanted to die so she could be with her daddy. She said Hensley just got back from the beach and has had rights and freedoms that have been denied her son, who she said walked away three times to avoid a fight the day he was killed.

David Belser, Attorney for the Defense, said this has been a horrible situation for the victim' family and for the defendant's family. He said Larry Wilt had lived with the Hensley's on and off since the 6th grade. He participated in family vacations and family reunions with the Hensley family.

He said the defendant had a good work history listing jobs held as a dishwasher and for a couple of paving companies. He said the Defense would like for the defendant to get work release at the earliest opportunity if it pleased the court.

The judge found the defendant guilty of a Class D Felony. Voluntary Manslaughter, and would be sentenced in the mitigated range because the mitigating factors outweighed aggravating factors. The sentence is 48-67 months, with credit for 16 days jail credit and work release would be recommended.

At this point, there was an outburst from someone sitting with the family of Larry Wilt. A young man shouted “How is this justice? I hope you wake up every morning and see your disfigured face.” The judge ordered the person removed from the court room.

The judge then continued with the sentence, requiring that a DNA sample be submitted.

Hensley was handcuffed and taken from the courtroom.

The judge directed the audience to exit in a peaceful manner or face 30 days in jail or a $500 fine. He noted that inside the courtroom is not the place to demonstrate against a verdict.

Court was dismissed for the day.



Tuesday, August 18, 2015

State Seeks Death Penalty for Charles Andrew Cochran



The State will be seeking the death penalty for Charles Andrew Cochran for the murder of Day Williamson, of Franklin, NC after numerous attempts to get the defendant to accept a plea deal for life without parole that avoided the death penalty. The State will file paperwork by 5:00 pm today to get that process moving and get an additional attorney appointed to assist Belzer in the defense of his client.


An additional administrative hearing has been scheduled for November 16th, during which time a Rule 24 hearing may take place or be scheduled at another time in the future. *correction* A Rule 24 hearing did take place. My apologies for the error. 


*note* This post has been edited to include information that the deal included life without parole.

*note 2* This was published during the second day (ever) of covering the court system, so expect errors on my part. These guys do not do business like an elected body, making sure the audience understands what is taking place. As long as the Judge and Attorneys know what is going on, they're going to do whatever it is that they're doing. If you're one of those few inititiates who do know what is going on, please do not hesitate to let me know. Since the web provide for the MaconMedia.com website is having issues, the normal email address of editor@MaconMedia.com is not working, so send me a private message on the facebook page http://www.fb.com/MaconCoMedia or comment on the post where the story has been linked. My intent is to cover the court system, in particular the superior courts, by being there during the entire session and not just parachuting in just for the big or interesting cases and ignoring the vast majority of the interaction between the public and the courts.
















Superior Court Cases
Morning Session on August 17, 2015

Macon County Courthouse photo 100_5885_zpsad6781ca.jpg

Superior Court for Macon County was called into session with the Honorable William H. Coward presiding.

Macon Media and The Franklin Press were the only local media organizations represented in this session of the court.

Here are a list of most of the court dispositions and decisions that took place on the morning of August 17th, augmented with brief notes taken while the court was in session. Any errors are mine and all defendants are presumed innocent until adjudicated by the court. Where possible, hyperlinks to material that may help promote understanding of the legal process in North Carolina.

Here are links to some documents to help you understand how the court system works and some of the legal jargon in the coverage:

A Citizen's Guide to Structured Sentencing

NC Superior Court Judges' Benchbook


The cases are listed in the order in which they appeared.

Anglin, Paula 14CRS050535 Dissemination to minors under the age of 16 years.
Represented by Hensley, Robert


The Defense entered a plea of guilty as part of a plea arrangement with the prosecution that exposed the defendant to a maximum of 59 months in the NC DOC (North Carolina Department of Corrections).

The judge sentenced the defendant to 15 to 27 months, suspended for a 24 month term of probation and a $500 fine and 12 hours of community service. The physical evidence in this case is to be destroyed and the defendant must register for 30 years as a sex offender.

Cowart, Jessie (numerous case numbers, primarily unindicted)
Represented by Gillette, Jeffrey

The State noted that the defendant was before the court regarding an April case and was currently unindicted in a recent case. After a discussion on the particulars, the judge set September 8th for a bond hearing and to handle other matters in the new case.

Waldroop, Gergory 14CRS050866 Driving While Impaired
Represented by Stewart, J.

This defendant was listed in error for this session and was scheduled for trial on 12-14-2015.

Moore, Thomas 15CRS050237 Traffick in Methamphetamine
Represented by Gillete, Jeffrey

Trail date of 12-14-2015.

Ortega, Janet Gonzales 14CRS051399, 14CRS051401 to 14CRS051403 (various fraud charges)
Represented by Hensley, Robert

The Prosecution noted that this defendant needed an interpreter and none were available today.
The case was continued to 11-16-2015 for a plea.

Prince, Christopher (not listed on the published court calendar)
Represented by Hensley, Robert

The case was continued to 11-16-2015.

Bush, Ryan Wesley 15CRS000115 Possess Drug Paraphernalia
No representation

The defendant filed for a court appointed attorney. Norwood was appointed.

After a brief recess, the court continued with numerous probation violation cases that required administrative action.

Stone, Mark Anthony 14CRS051722
Represented by Cassady, Rich

The defendant failed to appear when called. An order for arrest was issued by the court and a cash bond of $70,000 was set. (The defendant appeared later in the session and the order for arrest was canceled).

Rousselle, Jeffrey Todd 14CRS050525 Indecent Liberties with a Child
Represented by Beyer, Nikki

The Defense motioned for the defendant to be allowed to purchase a flip type phone so his employer could tell him where to go during his job. The conditions of his probation denies him the use of a cellphone capable of browsing the internet, sending photos or text messages as the crime he was convicted of was committed with this type of device. After a lengthy discussion on the particulars, the Defense withdrew the motion.

Ellenburg, Julius Phillip 13CRS051053 & 13CRS051054 Indecent Liberties with a Child
Represented by Cassady, Rich

A trial date of 12-14-2015 was set.

Cabe, Aaron Paul 14CRS051100, 14CRS 051101 and 15CRS 000205
(various drug and gun charges)
Represented by Cassady, Rich

The case was continued to 11-16-2015.

Browning, Erica Annette 14CRS000076 to 14 CRS000078 Embezzlement
Represented by Foster, Mark

This case was dismissed by the Prosection.

Garrison, Phylis Rena 14CRS000234, 14CRS000235, 14CRS050367, 14CRS050418, 14CRS050419 and 15CRS050003 (Charges include B&E, Larceny, possession of Stolen Goods and various drug charges that include Methamphetamine Possession)
The defendant waived the right to have an attorney.

The Defendant entered a Plea of Guilty and after some consultation with the Prosecution and defense over restitution, including a trip to the Judges Chambers, the case was continued to 11-16-2015 to determine the amount of restitution.

Starkweather, Mark 11CRS000699 Probation Violation (Original case was Indecent Liberties with a Child)
Represented by Cassady, Rich

The Defendant was sentenced to a 90 day CRV for a nonrevocable offense and will return to probation upon release.

Scott, Michael 15CRS050517 Burning Certain Buildings
Represented by Lepre, Stephanie

Continued to 11-16-2015.

Sutton, Joshua Lee 14CRS050521, 14CRS050522 and 15CRS000024 (charges include possession of various drugs, marijuana, Cocaine and Methamphetamine and gun charges)
Represented by Lepre, Stephanie

Trail date set for 12-14-2015.

The court recessed until 2:00 pm.





Tuesday, May 6, 2014

Franklin Aldermen 05-05-2014

 photo P1160594_zps292aaf14.jpg





The Franklin Town Board of Aldermen met last night for their regular meeting for May 2014. I have posted the video I recorded above and the public agenda, the press kit and a searchable copy of the Town Manager's Budget Message to the Aldermen below. You may read the play by play I posted on the Macon Media Facebook Page.


Near the end of the meeting, the Aldermen went into a closed session that lasted about nine minutes. When they came out, the Aldermen passed a resolution to acquire some property for a sum of money to settle a suit filed by the John W. Mitchell Jr Revocable Trust had filed against the Town of Franklin in Superior Court for the amount of $180,300. I have a copy of that resolution below the public agenda. I have embedded a copy of the agenda packet that members of the board and the media receive. I have included a link for you to download a copy for your personal records if you so wish.



PUBLIC AGENDA


Town of Franklin Board of Aldermen 

Meeting Agenda

Monday May 5, 2013 - 7:00 p.m. 

  1. Call to order- Mayor Bob Scott
  2. Pledge of Allegiance
  3. Adoption of May 5, 2014 Proposed Agenda
  4. Approval of April 7 and April 28, 2014 Board Minutes
  5. Public Hearing 7:05 p.m. for Rezoning Petition for Six (6) Parcels on East Palmer Street and Porter Street
  6. Public Hearing 7:10 p.m. for Application to Amend Text Only of the Unified Development Ordinance for the Outdoor Display of Goods
  7. Public Session
  8. New Business
    • Board Decision on Rezoning Petition for Six (6) Parcels on East Palmer Street and Porter Street
    • Board Decision on Application to Amend Text Only of the Unified Development Ordinance for the Outdoor Display of Goods
    • Presentation by the Community Care Clinic
    • Proclamation for Law Enforcement Memorial Day- Mayor Bob Scott
    • Special Use Application for Wireless Telecommunications Eligible Facilities Request at 90 Cunningham Road- Land Use Administrator Justin Setser
    • Set Public Hearing for Rezoning Petition for Macon County and the Town of Franklin Properties- Land Use Administrator Justin Setser
    • Set Public Hearing for the Application to Amend Text Only of the Unified Development Ordinance for Microbrewery and Brewpub- Land Use Administrator Justin Setser
    • Streets
      1. Stop Sign and Intersection Change on Pauline Avenue and Ulco Drive
      2. Watauga Street One Way
    • Budget Amendments- Finance Officer Janet Anderson
    • Proposed Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Budget- Interim Town Manager Summer Woodard
      1. Presentation of the Proposed Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Town of Franklin Budget
      2. Set Budget Work Session for Saturday May 17, 2014 at 9:00 a.m.
      3. Set Public Hearing for the Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Budget for Monday June 2, 2014 at 7:05 p.m.
  9. Legal
    1. Closed session pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-318.11(a) (3), “to consult with an attorney employed or retained by the public body in order to preserve the attorney-client privilege between the attorney and the public body, which privilege is hereby acknowledged”, the matter of an inverse condemnation claim, John W. Mitchell Trust v. Town of Franklin, file no. 12-CVS-228 in the files of the Clerk of Superior Court for Macon County.
  10. Adjourn

RESOLUTION TO SETTLE CLAIM AGAINST TOWN

[I have added a couple of hyperlinks to the document that might help you understand the document better. -Bobby]

RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN FOR THE TOWN OF FRANKLIN TO ACQUIRE REAL PROPERTY AND SETTLE THE MATTER OF JOHN W. MITCHELL, JR. REVOCABLE TRUST V. TOWN OF FRANKLIN, 12-CVS-228, AND TO DECLARE THE REAL PROPERTY SO ACQUIRED SURPLUS
WHEREAS, pursuant to NCGS 160a-11, the board of aldermen for the Town of Franklin is empowered inter alia to acquire real property; and
WHEREAS, construction of the Crawford Branch sewer line replacement project required said line to cross a portion of the property located at 381 East Main Street, being Macon County parcel number 6595303520 and described in that deed dated February 6, 2009 from Kenneth R. Kopp and wife Alison J. Kopp to John W. Mitchell, Jr., and Bobby J. Key as Co-Trustees of the John W. Mitchell, Jr. Revocable Trust, u/t/a dated May 30, 2003, recorded in book V-32, pages 335-338 of the Macon County Public Registry (the “Property”); and
WHEREAS, the said John W. Mitchell, Jr. Revocable Trust, as Plaintiff, instituted an action in Superior Court concerning the said sewer line, file number 12-CVS-228 [download a copy] in the Office of the Clerk of Superior Court for Macon County; and
WHEREAS, the Plaintiff has offered and the Town agreed to completely settle the said action and all matters related thereto upon payment of the sum stated in Section 1 of this Resolution, in exchange for which the Plaintiff will convey the Property to the Town of Franklin; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Aldermen finds that the said sum is fair and full consideration for the property and payment of the other fees and costs of this matter; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Aldermen finds that the Property is not necessary for public purposes and therefore need not be retained;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Aldermen for the town of Franklin, the following:
Section 1. The sum of $180,300.00 is hereby appropriated from the town's retained earnings. The Town's Interim Manager and Finance Officer, or their successors in office, are authorized to pay the said sum unto the Clerk of Superior Court for Macon County, to be released to the said Plaintiff.
Section 2. The Mayor is authorized to execute, on behalf of the Town of Franklin and as its corporate act, that Consent Judgment attached hereto and made a part hereof, and to so execute such documents as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this Resolution.

AGENDA PACKET FOR MEDIA AND BOARD MEMBERS





PROPOSED BUDGET FOR THE TOWN OF FRANKLIN FOR 2014-2015


Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Update on ObamaCare in the Supreme Court
Day One and Two Coverage

The United States Supreme Court
Photo by Scarlet Holland


Today is the third and last day of arguments in the epic effort to overturn or blunt ObamaCare in the United States Supreme Court. I've been too busy to blog about it, but cannot let it go by unacknowledged. So, here are some links to what happened on the first and second day of arguments.

You can also download a PDF Guide to the issues before the Supreme Court from the Texas Public Policy Foundation.

I will post again after the third day, recapping this coverage with the addition of the third day argument.

So far, from what I have been able to gather, I am hopeful that...at the very least...the individual mandate is dead. If this is so, we will probably be able to render the rest of ObamaCare moot over the course of the next few months.


Day One

I have embedded the full audio from today's oral argument in the Supreme Court:

Download MP3

The curtain lifted this morning on the first act of the three-day drama that is the challenge to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known (more colloquially) as just “the health care statute” and (mostly) by opponents “Obamacare.” And what a scene it was. Outside, protesters gathered with megaphones, while inside the courtroom the reporters craned their necks to spot politicians and other influential Washingtonians in the gallery.

The procedural issue before the Court in today’s argument was whether an obscure Reconstruction-era law, the Anti-Injunction Act (AIA), would bar the Court from even considering the merits of the question that most people regard as the main event of the health care litigation: the constitutionality of the ACA’s requirement that virtually all Americans obtain health insurance by January 1, 2014 or face a penalty.

The issue comes up because the AIA prohibits lawsuits to challenge a tax until the tax has actually been assessed; the penalty for the failure to obtain insurance in the health care statute is, the argument goes, a tax for purposes of the AIA.

By the time the ninety minutes of argument were over, it seemed likely that the answer to that question is that the AIA will not stop the Court from deciding the constitutionality of the mandate. But if it remains to be seen how the Court will reach this result and move on to consider the mandate on its merits.
Source: SCOTUSblog: Anti-Injunction Act oral argument: In Plain English

TODAY’S ISSUE: The applicability of the Anti-Injunction Act (AIA) as it relates to the individual mandate’s tax penalty.

KEY POINTS FROM THE ARGUMENT: Most of the justices seemed skeptical of the argument that the challenge to the individual mandate is barred by the AIA because the mandate is a tax. As Justice Ginsburg noted, “This is not a revenue-raising measure, because, if it’s successful, they won’t – nobody will pay the penalty and there will be no revenue to raise.” Justice Breyer agreed: “They called it a penalty and not a tax for a reason.”
Source: PPAC Action: Florida v. HHS - What Happened Monday

Recap of SCOTUSblog coverage
Condensed Audio of argument from SCOTUSblog
ObamaCare on trial, day 1 from Texas PolicyCast


Day Two

The full audio from today's oral argument in the Supreme Court:

Download MP3

This morning the Court reconvened to hear two hours’ worth of oral arguments on the question at the heart of the battle over the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA): whether the government can require virtually all Americans to obtain health insurance by January 1, 2014 or face a penalty. Although this question had long been regarded as the “main event” of the three days that the Court will devote to oral arguments on the ACA, it gained even more significance (to the extent that such a thing is possible) after yesterday’s argument, in which the Justices signaled that they are not likely to let a little-known nineteenth-century law deter them from reaching the merits of today’s question. And after today’s argument, it is not at all clear whether the mandate will survive.
Source: SCOTUSblog: Today’s argument in Plain English: Will the mandate squeak by?

KEY POINTS FROM THE ARGUMENT: Several of the justices expressed skepticism about the propriety of the mandate. Justice Kennedy stated that the mandate “changes the relationship of the Federal Government to the individual in the very fundamental way.” Justice Scalia said that a law which violates the principle of limited powers cannot be “proper” within the meaning of the Necessary and Proper Clause. And Justices Roberts and Alito seemed deeply troubled by the government’s inability to articulate a limiting principle for the federal commerce power.

The Justices who seemed to favor the mandate’s constitutionality did not seem to agree on the basis for sustaining the law. Justice Breyer effectively conceded the challengers’ argument that upholding the mandate would make federal authority unlimited. Justice Ginsburg, by contrast, focused more narrowly on the costs uncompensated care have on the wider health insurance market.
Source: PPAC Action: What Happened at Today’s Oral Argument



Recap of SCOTUSblog coverage

Condensed Audio of argument from SCOTUSblog

ObamaCare on trial, day 2 from Texas PolicyCast

Interview With Mario Loyola on the Constitutionality of ObamaCare on the BattleSwarm Blog



Bookmark and Share

Monday, December 13, 2010

Federal Judge Rules ObamaCare Unconstitutional
Read the Ruling

**4.36am 12-13-2010** Virginia Attorney General says ruling removes funding mechanism from ObamaCare...





As expected, a federal judge found that requiring private citizens to purchase a private sector product (the individual mandate) is unconstitutional.


Here is the ruling of the judge:

Opinion

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Special Forces: Untold Stories
Navy SEALs in Panama

us navy seals Pictures, Images and Photos

Visit Support The SEALs to learn how you can help defend 3 of our heroes who are fighting for their freedom against the word of a terrorist.

As part of an effort to show support for the 3 Navy SEALs being charged with roughing up a terrorist responsible for the murder and mutilation of Americans in Iraq, I will be posting on the history and training of America's elite military forces for the duration of their courts martial trial.






This is the first in the series, and is a re-telling of the US Navy SEALs experience during the removal of General Manuel Noriega from Panama in December 1989-January 1990. He was captured, detained as a prisoner of war, and flown to the U.S. Noriega was tried on eight counts of drug trafficking, racketeering, and money laundering in April 1992.

More information on Operation Just Cause can be found at
Global Security. And more information on the lessons learned from the Psychological Component of the operation can be found at Psywarrior.




This is a 5 video play list. Give it a moment or two between videos to load.

Duke Power Wins Fight to Demolish Dillsboro Dam
Liberals Rejoice


It seems weird to see Liberals on the same side as Duke Power, but there you have it.

The plans to provide an economically attractive park for Dillsboro, NC have been thwarted in favor of providing a few lefty Whitewater kayakers some thrills as they pass by Dillsboro, headed south.



Related: PDF of Ruling



Commentary

I guess that means I'll have to get out to Dillsboro soon to do some video recording of the Dillsboro Dam for archival purposes so I can remember the historical landmark and share it with future generations.

The Sylva Herald has some footage of preparations to begin the dam removal process:






And I'll leave you with a brief video by a gloating Lefty from September: